close
close

Two candidates are running for the 40th district of the Iowa House of Representatives in Altoona and Ankeny

Two candidates are running for the 40th district of the Iowa House of Representatives in Altoona and Ankeny

In the general election, two candidates are running for the 40th Iowa House of Representatives district, which includes Altoona, the northeastern tip of Des Moines, part of southern Ankeny and areas of unincorporated Polk County such as Norwoodville, Berwick and the area around Saydel High School.

Incumbent Republican Rep. Bill Gustoff is seeking a second term in the Iowa House of Representatives and will face Democrat Heather Sievers.

To help voters, the Des Moines Register sent questions to all Des Moines state and legislative candidates running for political office this year. Their responses have been lightly edited for length and clarity.

The parliamentary elections will take place on November 5.

Who is Bill Gustoff (incumbent)?

Age: 56

Party: republican

Current place of residence: Des Moines

Where did you grow up? Center

Education: Juris Doctor from the University of Iowa College of Law in 1995

Profession: lawyer

Who is Heather Sievers?

Age: 39

Party: Democratically

Current place of residence: Altoona

Where did you grow up: panorama

Education: Double Master in Counseling Psychology and Nursing Management

Profession: Performance Improvement Manager at UnityPoint Health for the four hospitals in Des Moines, focused on implementing improvements and reforms in healthcare delivery

Political experience and civic engagement: 1. Founder of Advocates for Iowa's Children: a group of 5,300 Iowans across the state fighting for improvements in public education, teachers, students, and our regional education agencies who have cared for my own daughter with a rare disability called Smith-Magenis Syndrome since she was 2 years old. 2. Advocate for the American Civil Liberties Union fighting for reproductive freedoms and LGBTQIA rights and protections. 3. Union supporter and advocate (with a husband who is a proud union member) and recently endorsed by the AFL-CIO.

What would be your main concern if you were elected?

Gustoff: We want to ensure that Iowa continues to be a national leader in economic development and the protection of individual liberties, and that the state continues to offer the best conditions for running a business and raising a family.

Sievers: At the top of my list are fighting the chronic underfunding of our public schools, closing harmful voucher programs that only support private schools, and repairing the damage done to our AEAs this legislative session. But as a medical professional, expanding and improving substance abuse and mental health services is critical, as is improving the accessibility and affordability of all health care (including major improvements in care for our elderly). I will also never stop protecting individual freedoms for all and advancing racial justice. Iowa used to be progressive and supportive of diversity and caring about all people. I will work very hard to restore that.

What measures would you support to improve Iowa's education system?

Gustoff: I was very proud to help pass the bill to raise the starting salary for teachers to the fifth highest in the country through the Iowa House of Representatives. I have also worked hard to pass a number of bills designed to improve Iowa's education system, give parents more control over their children's education, help teachers regain control of classroom discipline, protect children from educational indoctrination, and provide record levels of funding for K-12 education. Giving parents control over their children's education, ensuring accountability in the system, and rewarding schools and teachers that produce results for their students is the best way to continue to improve Iowa's education system.

Sievers: I will support policies that repeal the voucher program law that will shift millions of dollars over time from public schools to private schools that educate only 50,000 children. These laws passed by the Republican Party are not “parent choice” but “private school choice” laws that take money away from 500,000 children who attend public schools in this state. I will fight for SSA funding above 6% that we have needed for years and that our government can afford. I intend to enact policies that will implement nutrition and wellness programs in schools and early childhood programs and advance inclusion programs. I will help restore our AEAs.

What do you think Iowa's tax policy should look like? Do you think the state's priority should be lowering tax rates or spending on services for Iowans?

Gustoff: Iowans overwhelmingly support ongoing efforts to make our tax rates as low and fair as possible, and we've accomplished just that. Iowa is a national leader in letting hardworking taxpayers get more of their money while fully funding Iowans' priorities. In addition to our great work on income taxes, we must also provide Iowans with property tax relief.

Sievers: Republican legislation to cut the income tax to a flat rate may sound good on paper, but flat rates still allow the wealthy huge depreciation loopholes. This will result in billions in cuts to state revenues used for roads, infrastructure, and public services that must be paid for to keep our cities going. Low- to middle-income families will not feel the impact on their paychecks enough to offset the increases in sales and/or property taxes that will inevitably come when the once-in-a-lifetime bank of money Republicans hope to tap into is depleted. The rich pay the same price for an apple as the poor. If food prices continue to rise, Iowans will suffer. We need balanced tax reform that helps all Iowans.

What measures would you support to improve school safety in Iowa?

Gustoff: The first 30 seconds in an active shooting situation are the most critical to the outcome. If a shooter cannot be stopped within 30 seconds, decades of historical data suggest it will almost certainly result in casualties above single digits. The new permit system to train and arm teachers and staff will be an effective strategy to reduce response times for schools that choose to implement it. Iowa law already allowed teachers to carry firearms in schools. Our bill raises the bar on the training required to do so. No teacher or school district is required to participate in the new permit system, but I am confident it will reduce response times and increase student safety.

Sievers: We should focus on improving mental health, not using force to combat violence. Republican legislation allowing more guns after Perry was shot goes against majority opinion. I asked my school board to vote against allowing teachers/staff to be armed. Guns in schools are so risky that Republicans built in civil and criminal liability protections, meaning no one can be held responsible if a child is accidentally killed. Police don't even have criminal liability protections and are highly trained in handling guns. We need to focus on school security, creating a single point of entry, scanning backpacks, and making sure no one comes to school with guns. Our kids deserve better.

Iowa's six-week ban on abortion based on the “fetal heartbeat” is now in effect. What next steps do you think Iowa lawmakers should take regarding abortion?

Gustoff: The citizens of Iowa do not believe in unrestricted abortion for any reason and at all stages of pregnancy. Our duly elected legislature has passed laws reflecting the will of the people, only to have them overturned by unelected activist judges. Recent court decisions have put this issue back where it belongs – in the hands of the citizens of Iowa through their elected representatives, and the Iowa Legislature voted in a special session to reinstate the same law expressing the will of the people. I am pro-life and believe that we must do everything we can to protect the lives of innocent unborn babies and support expectant and new mothers by making adoption easier and implementing the recently expanded MOMS Act.

Sievers: As a medical professional, I will always defend the sanctity of medical decisions made confidentially between doctor and patient. The national abortion rate is only 7%. Many of these are for medical reasons. No one in government should be making decisions for a woman or her family. Abortion laws limit access to quality reproductive health care, doctors abandon women, women die, children are left without their mothers, women are forced to give birth to babies without a heartbeat, they are pushed into trauma, and babies are born with minimal quality of life. Your body, your decision. People can choose not to have an abortion. People must be able to make their own medical decisions. The government must stay out of it.

Related Post