close
close

Breakdown of migration talks: just a big show?

Breakdown of migration talks: just a big show?

CDU leader Friedrich Merz says he regrets the breakdown of talks – just a tactic?

Source: IMAGO / Bernd Elmenthaler


It is certainly no exaggeration to describe the Union's migration policy proposals on rejections at the border as far-reaching. The Union faction formulated the idea of ​​”comprehensive” proposals in its executive board resolution last week, making this a precondition for serious negotiations with the traffic light coalition.
In practical terms, comprehensive would have meant that all people who do not have a visa, a residence permit or an EU passport would be turned away at the German borders in the future. A condition that is objectively a difficult pill to swallow for the traffic light coalition. Representatives of the Greens in particular had already reacted with scepticism beforehand, while the SPD and FDP sent cautious signals to the Union.

But was there realistically any chance of an agreement?

Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz looks on during a meeting at which Federal Finance Minister Christian Lindner presents his draft budget for 2025 to the Bundestag in Berlin on September 10, 2024.

After the aborted migration summit, the SPD and the Union are blaming each other. Scholz accused Merz of planning a failure and the Chancellor of lacking leadership.11.09.2024 | 1:34 mins


Similar scenario already planned in 2015

The Union's idea is actually nothing new. In September 2015, at the height of the refugee crisis, the federal government under Chancellor Angela Merkel had already prepared a similar scenario, which was only called off at the last minute for fear of the unpopular images. But that was the time of the grand coalition. In particular, the Greens, whose core DNA includes a liberal migration policy, were not involved at the time.
And so it does not seem surprising if one were to interpret the statement by Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock (Greens), who spoke of foreign policy damage even before the talks failed, as a rejection of the CDU's plans. One must “have the strength to work for pan-European solutions and not to go it alone – have the strength to defend Europe, our freedom of movement, our life insurance with Schengen, instead of endangering them,” said Baerbock.
SGS Nourripur

The Union was “not particularly serious about” the summit on migration, says the co-chair of the Greens, Omid Nouripour. But the door remains open for talks.11.09.2024 | 4:37 mins


The question of guilt is discussed in public

When the talks were stopped in the afternoon, the blame game began. Because, unlike in 2015, when the idea of ​​closing the border was initially hidden from a much larger public, it is now being discussed in front of the assembled public.

Berlin: Nancy Faeser (l, SPD), Federal Minister of the Interior and Home Affairs, Marco Buschmann (M, FDP), Federal Minister of Justice, and Annalena Baerbock (Alliance 90/The Greens), Foreign Minister, at a press conference

Nancy Faeser (l.), Marco Buschmann, Annalena Baerbock (r.) at the press conference after the talks with the Union.

Source: dpa


At the first press conference, a visibly satisfied Baerbock was seen: “Obviously, some gentlemen were, it must be said, surprised that we are playing as a team here,” she said on the podium, where the traffic light coalition demonstrated its unity.

FDP Justice Minister Marco Buschmann, who acknowledged that changes must be made, referred to the current legal situation, which the CDU model does not take into account.

One cannot expect a federal government to openly violate the law, especially in contradiction to existing administrative court rulings.

Marco Buschmann (FDP), Minister of Justice

The Union, on the other hand, accuses the government of a kind of unwillingness to make a decision, as if they had already suspected that the coalition could not possibly agree to this.

At least that is how Friedrich Merz (CDU) should be understood when he regretted the cancellation, but also said that this was “the reality of this traffic light coalition” and of coalition partners who “are coming together less and less”. But who is right now? Did the Union deliberately overstep the mark or did they simply not want or could not implement the traffic light coalition?
TN: These are the plans of the traffic light ministers

The government and the Union could not agree on comprehensive rejections of migrants at the country's borders.10.09.2024 | 22:59 minutes


Traffic light’s own rejection model

The fact that the Union's demands have struck a chord with the traffic light coalition is evident from the hectic work in the Interior, Justice and Foreign Ministries over the past weekend. While there has been little public comment on the Union's conditions, there has been all the more zealous work on their own proposal to reject asylum seekers.

It has long been clear to the traffic light coalition that the previous practice of first taking in migrants and then clarifying their residency status after they have been distributed throughout the country is no longer appropriate. Too many municipalities are groaning under the burden of accommodation and the inability to guarantee integration. There is a lack of beds, doctors, daycare and school places.

In the rejection plan that was then published, the traffic light coalition relies on border checks, fast-track procedures, detention centers near the border and cooperation with neighboring countries. A model that was clearly not enough for the Union.

What the traffic light coalition has proposed will not lead to more rejections, not a single one.

Thorsten Frei (CDU), Union negotiator

Rhine (CDU): "The traffic light is incapable of action"

“In this situation, we need clear measures to limit irregular migration; we need a real stop sign at the German borders,” said Boris Rhein.
10.09.2024 | 4:45 mins


All have failed

It remains to be seen whether the traffic light model will work at all. In any case, an administration that can make decisions 24/7 would be a real novelty. However, it remains to be seen whether it will reduce the pressure of migration in the municipalities. In any case, the CDU chairman defended himself on Wednesday against the accusation that the Union's initiative was a staged event.

That was “infamous,” he said, referring to Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who had previously accused Merz of being the type of politician who believed he could solve the migration issue with an interview with Bild am Sonntag.

And so the impression remains that with the breakdown of the talks, everyone has lost: the opposition, whose push for the traffic light coalition failed, and the traffic light coalition, which held together but whose own plan seems more confused than practical.

A person is holding a smartphone in their hand. It shows the ZDFheute WhatsApp channel.

Source: ZDF


Do you want to stay up to date? Then our ZDFheute WhatsApp channel is the right place for you. Whether in the morning with coffee, at lunchtime or after work – you will receive the most important news directly on your smartphone. Take part in surveys or get inspired by our mini podcast “Kurze Auszeit”. Simply sign up for our WhatsApp channel here: ZDFheute WhatsApp channel.

Related Post