close
close

Keir Starmer flatters the extreme right

Keir Starmer flatters the extreme right

When Keir Starmer cancelled the Tories' disastrous deal on deportations from Rwanda just days after taking office, there was great relief. Many welcomed this seemingly decisive departure from the strategy of the previous government, which sought to distract from its failure to govern by using relentless cruelty towards migrants.

Some even hoped that Labour's campaign – which saw a defecting far-right Conservative MP argue that the Tories were not strict enough on borders – was just a clever electoral maneuver. But as the Labour government pushes ahead with mass deportations and workplace raids, reopens abuse-ridden detention camps and considers bringing Britain back into the fold of a deadly European immigration control regime, it looks like Starmer's campaign should be taken literally.

This week, the prime minister is in Italy, meeting with Giorgia Meloni, a politician who came to power at the head of a party founded after World War II to uphold the legacy of Benito Mussolini and Italian fascism. Starmer says he wants to learn from and work with Meloni's approach to migration.

This happened while Italy and Albania signed an agreement that provides for the construction of detention camps on Albanian territory. Third-country nationals rescued in the Mediterranean will be taken there to have their asylum applications processed extraterritorially and possibly be expelled. Meloni described the protocol as a “historic agreement for the entire EU”.

Human rights groups warn that the arbitrary detention legitimized by the agreement could lead to potential human rights violations, particularly in relation to legal aid and asylum rights. Asylum hearings will be held remotely and overstaffed Italian authorities will be tasked with processing applications from Albania in just 28 days, further limiting due process.

During a visit to the centres in Albania this week, we saw the rapid construction of a seven-metre-high wall that surrounds the detention centres. According to the guards who patrol the camps, “this will ensure that no migrant detained there can escape.”

The agreement with Albania is the latest in a series of Italian moves that have worsened the already dire situation in the central Mediterranean, the world's deadliest migration route. Meloni took office promising a “naval blockade” against migrants. Last year, one of our own was on a civilian sea rescue ship that was arrested and fined for allegedly saving too many lives.

Italy routinely uses arbitrary detention, the assignment of distant safe ports, bureaucratic harassment or outright arrest to prevent people from saving lives at sea. The rhetoric about cracking down on smuggling gangs seems simple. But in reality, people seeking safety, people providing assistance and people providing basic services are routinely criminalised as smugglers.

The case of Ibrahima Bah, a teenager from Senegal who was convicted of “illegal” entry into the UK and manslaughter, reminds us of the consequences of criminalising people who migrate as smugglers. Bah was arrested in December 2022 and later sentenced to nine years in prison by British authorities for driving a boat across the Channel.

The tragic sinking of the boat resulted in the death of four people. Since there were hardly any navigable and legal routes, Ibrahima was forced to steer the boat in exchange for free passage for himself and his brother. Such cases are common in Italy.

It gets worse. Starmer and his foreign minister David Lammy have also indicated that they want to be inspired by the European agreements with Libya and Syria.

For years, Italy, together with France and the EU, has been pumping money into the so-called “Libyan Coast Guard,” a force that regularly mistreats and shoots people crossing the Mediterranean, and then drags them back to detention centers in Libya.

Violence, torture and slavery are commonplace in Libya's notorious detention camps. Many prisoners are held in these camps after being intercepted and returned in a desperate attempt to reach Europe. Horrifying reports speak of overcrowding in unventilated rooms where food is pushed through behind closed doors, routine beatings and regular outbreaks of disease due to unsanitary conditions.

Contrary to the rhetoric of “busting gangs,” European funds have found their way into the hands of militias deeply involved in smuggling and assigned the positions of boats in distress by the EU's border agency Frontex. Earlier this year, European funds were also found to have been involved in police operations that rounded up thousands of mostly black migrants and dumped them in the harsh deserts of North Africa, where they were often left to die.

Syria remains a highly unsafe country for people wishing to return there, despite attempts by some EU states to “delineate” safe areas within Syria for refugees to return to. A recent report by the UN Fact-Finding Mission on Syria highlights the escalating humanitarian crises in several areas of Syria affected by the escalating wars. The report concludes that the country remains unsafe and the so-called “safe zones” are fundamentally flawed and inhumane.

When the Labour government scrapped the Rwanda Plan, it rightly pointed out that it was cruel and unworkable. Outsourcing border violence to other countries does not prevent migration; it only causes misery and suffering for those fleeing. It funnels much-needed public money into the hands of unscrupulous governments and profit-driven corporations who provide weapons, walls and surveillance to keep the machine running.

It is a tragic irony that Starmer's visit to Italy also saw him announce a £485 million British investment from Leonardo, a defence company involved in both selling weapons to conflict zones from which people are being displaced and building the militarised borders that face those fleeing.

The “migration crisis” narrative obscures the complicity of powerful countries like Italy and the UK in encouraging displacement through their economic and foreign policies. And it undermines the human rights frameworks that protect us all.

A prime minister who has made much of his past as a human rights lawyer should understand this. We are witnessing an unprecedented erosion of rights, values ​​and norms, of which migration is just one example.

The promise of the Social Democrats and Liberal Democrats was that they would restore decency to politics, and not take advice from far-right governments. Rather than repeating the previous government's strategy of migrant-baiting and brutality – which only a few weeks ago led to mobs attempting to burn asylum seekers to the ground – Starmer should use his majority to chart a different course: one that honours our obligation to protect, rather than harm, people seeking safety, and that does not seek to divide us based on where we were born.

On his return from Italy, the Prime Minister should focus on home: addressing the needs of the population and public services suffering from years of austerity and mismanagement, and building the fairer and more decent Britain he promised.

Related Post